<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Walt Crawford&#8217;s Public Library Blogs: essential reading if your library is (even thinking about) blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtuallyalibrarian.com/2008/12/13/walt-crawfords-public-library-blogs-essential-reading-if-your-library-is-even-thinking-about-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtuallyalibrarian.com/2008/12/13/walt-crawfords-public-library-blogs-essential-reading-if-your-library-is-even-thinking-about-blogging/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 03:49:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt crawford</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyalibrarian.com/2008/12/13/walt-crawfords-public-library-blogs-essential-reading-if-your-library-is-even-thinking-about-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-19734</link>
		<dc:creator>walt crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyalibrarian.com/?p=81#comment-19734</guid>
		<description>Wow. Thanks for the comment--just about the first there&#039;s been on this book (or at least the first favorable), in about a year since it came out. I was just about to put the book out of print; maybe I&#039;ll modify that decision, at least for the downloadable version.

Your penultimate paragraph makes a lot of sense, particularly for library blogs (as opposed to liblogs). 

I would love to continue this and the parallel academic library blog study, with some different levels of analysis, since even on a purely-external basis you can find out a lot. But I can&#039;t do it based on the proceeds from selling fewer than a hundred books (that&#039;s both studies combined): It&#039;s a prohibitively poor use of my time. So, barring sponsorship (from a library school, vendor, or whoever), it&#039;s not going to happen. Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Thanks for the comment&#8211;just about the first there&#8217;s been on this book (or at least the first favorable), in about a year since it came out. I was just about to put the book out of print; maybe I&#8217;ll modify that decision, at least for the downloadable version.</p>
<p>Your penultimate paragraph makes a lot of sense, particularly for library blogs (as opposed to liblogs). </p>
<p>I would love to continue this and the parallel academic library blog study, with some different levels of analysis, since even on a purely-external basis you can find out a lot. But I can&#8217;t do it based on the proceeds from selling fewer than a hundred books (that&#8217;s both studies combined): It&#8217;s a prohibitively poor use of my time. So, barring sponsorship (from a library school, vendor, or whoever), it&#8217;s not going to happen. Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
